A/B Testing

A/B Testing, also referred to as split testing, is a cost-effective marketing technique that involves testing two versions of a site or program to see which performs best. These versions, called A and B, are supplied randomly to visitors. A small portion of these will be directed towards the original site and the remainder to the alternative version. Typically, marketers offer A/B split testing for a specific purpose. For instance, some testing may determine whether a site’s content is optimized for specific search keywords. In some cases, a test may be conducted to establish if a web designer can offer different designs to the same page without the user having to re-click the link.

Split testing is a simple process and relies upon a few simple assumptions: that the ideal user will view the same page twice, that the ideal customer will experience a change in behaviour and intent, and that the ideal customer will not change course mid-course. Marketers develop A/B tests by establishing these assumptions and designing pages that are specifically optimized for each assumption. In most cases, marketers create A/B tests with A and B being identical. This ensures that the elements of the pages are the same: title, copy, colours, logos, etc.… However, some sites do require that one or both versions be modified to match the other.

In most cases, the best way to perform A/B testing is to determine which assumption holds for your site. Then, test each assumption one at a time to determine which performs best. Once marketers have determined that assumption holds for their site, they can modify that assumption to accommodate any changes or addictions users may have to their online experience. They will then re-run the split test with each variation using the new ‘best’ assumption.

The purpose of A/B testing is to determine which assumption in your model of conversion optimization best describes your user behaviour. It is not, however, to determine which version should be optimized. In addition to changing these assumptions, marketers will also need to adjust their tactics based on the actual results obtained using A/B testing.

A/B Testing allows marketers to make changes to their pages quickly and with minimal cost since the hypothesis used for the split test was previously determined. This allows marketers to perform several split test campaigns with only one assumption. Because adjustments made to one assumption are generally minor (if it does not change conversion rates), it is easy for marketers to make adjustments multiple times using A/B Testing. Since testing is typically performed with many different variations, marketers will reach a consensus regarding the most effective tweaks. Since all of the data collected is from actual users, adjustments made to assumption(s) will closely reflect actual user behaviour.

A/B Testing is only one method that can be used to measure conversions. A more common method is to use Landing Page Optimization (LPO). With LPO, marketers create several pages that include text, copy, graphics, and call-to-action buttons. Pages are then organized according to a particular theme or target market. After completing a campaign using A/B Testing, a report will show how the landing pages improved or stayed the same, allowing marketers to fine-tune their campaigns to boost conversion rates.

While A/B Testing can provide quick feedback about landing page performance, it is important to note that the results of A/B Testing are never complete since users can deliberately affect the outcome of the campaign. Thus, it is important that marketers carefully consider the results of their campaigns and adjust their tactics if the data obtained using A/B Testing does not support the conclusion that their hypothesis was correct. However, with tools like Conversion Meter, marketers can quickly determine which campaigns may need further A/B Testing to establish the hypothesis they came up with fully.

One important thing to remember when conducting a/b testing is that it should be a part of your overall advertising campaign. Many companies mistakenly believe that ad images alone are sufficient to draw in customers. However, this is not true. In fact, images can actually hurt your campaign because they may distract customers from reading your copy. Furthermore, the images can clog up your mailbox or emails. Finally, ads with pictures can also prove problematic because the graphics can get lost in the pile of documents at your fax machine.

Once you have conducted a/b testing and found that images are best working for your campaign, it’s time to determine which version you should use in your final campaign. Keep in mind that while different people react differently to different images, there will always be one that looks best for your readers. If you decide to test two different versions of your ad, make sure you use the same layout. It doesn’t do to have an ad that looks identical to another ad, as readers may have trouble making the connection between the two ads. Another thing to keep in mind is that if your layout still looks too similar to another competitor’s layout, then your ad may not perform as well. That’s why it’s important to test two different ads simultaneously; you can compare your layout and see which version brings in the most traffic, then make adjustments to improve your conversion rate.

In conclusion, A/B Testing provides marketers with valuable insights into which campaigns work and which do not. It can also help them determine what kinds of adjustments to make in their tactics if the data acquired using A/B Testing does not support the conclusion they’ve drawn from their A/B Testing. It may take some time and effort for marketers to obtain the right results from A/B Testing, but having access to this valuable information can help marketers make better decisions and avoid costly mistakes.

I can't express how much did I learn in a very short period during my scholarship and I can't wait for my next lessons, If you would like to read more, please check CXL Institute and learn from top marketing leaders.